The wrongful death of a child is among the most devastating losses a family can suffer, and Nevada law provides a specific framework for parents and surviving family members to seek compensation for that loss. When a child dies due to another party’s negligence — whether in a car accident, a drowning, a defective product failure, or premises liability — the legal claims available to the parents and estate are distinct from adult wrongful death cases in important ways. Marathon Law Group handles wrongful death cases involving child victims in Las Vegas with the sensitivity and legal rigor these cases demand.
Injured in Las Vegas? Call Marathon Law Group at (702) 522-1808 for a free consultation. Our personal injury attorneys work on contingency — you pay nothing unless we win your case.
Who Can File a Wrongful Death Claim for a Child in Nevada
Under NRS 41.085, a wrongful death claim must be brought by the personal representative of the deceased’s estate on behalf of the heirs. For a deceased minor child, the heirs under NRS 134.040 include both parents (if living and not legally disqualified), and siblings if both parents are deceased. In most child wrongful death cases, both parents together are the primary beneficiaries — the claim is brought by one parent as personal representative, but both parents share in any recovery. If the parents are divorced or separated, Nevada law still treats both as heirs to the child’s wrongful death claim, requiring coordination between the parents on the litigation. A surviving sibling is an heir only if both parents are deceased, which is unusual in child wrongful death cases.
Damages Available in Child Wrongful Death Cases
Nevada wrongful death damages for a deceased child differ from adult wrongful death cases in the composition of the economic damages but are equally uncapped on the non-economic side. Economic damages include: medical expenses incurred before death (emergency response, trauma care, hospital stay if the child survived briefly before dying); funeral and burial costs; and the value of the child’s future earnings projected over their expected work life — for a young child, this requires a forensic economist to project education level, career trajectory, and wage history over a 40-50 year work life, which can generate substantial present-value calculations. Non-economic damages under NRS 41.085(2) are typically the largest component of a child wrongful death case and include each parent’s individual loss of the child’s society, comfort, companionship, affection, and consortium — elements that a jury evaluates based on the parent-child relationship, the child’s personality and presence in the family, and the parents’ anticipated relationship with the child through adulthood and into the parents’ old age. Additionally, under NRS 41.140, the estate may also pursue a survival action for the child’s conscious pain and suffering and fear/anticipation of death between the time of the injury and death, if the child was conscious for any period after the fatal injury. These survival damages belong to the estate independently of the wrongful death claim.
Attractive Nuisance and Child Wrongful Death
Many child wrongful death cases arise in the attractive nuisance context — conditions that attract children who cannot appreciate the danger: unfenced swimming pools, construction site machinery, abandoned vehicles, accessible rooftops, or other hazards that foreseeably attract young children. Nevada follows the Restatement (Second) of Torts § 339 attractive nuisance doctrine: a land possessor who knows or should know that children will trespass and that a condition poses unreasonable risk of death or serious injury must exercise reasonable care to eliminate or guard the danger, even though the child is technically a trespasser. In child drowning cases — the leading cause of accidental death for children ages 1-4 nationally — the failure to adequately fence or cover a residential pool frequently gives rise to attractive nuisance liability even for trespassing children who entered through a neighbor’s yard. Pool fencing requirements under Clark County Code provide a negligence per se standard: a pool without the required fence or gate is a per se violation that supports the attractive nuisance claim without further proof of unreasonableness.
Contact Marathon Law Group — Las Vegas Child Wrongful Death Attorney
Child wrongful death cases require compassionate representation combined with rigorous expert analysis of economic damages projections and comprehensive pursuit of all available non-economic damages. Marathon Law Group represents Las Vegas families in wrongful death cases involving minor children. Contact us for a consultation.
If you or a loved one has been injured, contact our experienced Las Vegas wrongful death attorney at Marathon Law Group. We offer free consultations and only get paid when you win.