Las Vegas and the surrounding Nevada region have become a destination for adventure tourism — zip lines at Bootleg Canyon in Boulder City, the Rio hotel’s VooDoo Zip Line, indoor rock climbing gyms throughout the valley, trampoline parks, aerial obstacle courses, and guided off-road adventure tours through Red Rock Canyon and the Nevada desert. These activities carry inherent risks, but when an injury is caused by equipment failure, inadequate inspection, improper staff training, or negligent operation rather than the ordinary risks of the activity, the operator may be legally responsible for the resulting harm. The challenge in these cases is whether a pre-activity liability waiver signed by the participant bars the injury claim. Marathon Law Group advises Las Vegas adventure activity injury victims on their rights under Nevada law.
Injured in Las Vegas? Call Marathon Law Group at (702) 522-1808 for a free consultation. Our personal injury attorneys work on contingency — you pay nothing unless we win your case.
Nevada’s Gross Negligence Exception to Liability Waivers
Nevada enforces pre-injury liability waivers as a matter of public policy, recognizing that participants in inherently risky recreational activities can knowingly assume the ordinary risks of that activity. However, Nevada courts refuse to enforce waivers that attempt to release an operator from liability for gross negligence — conduct that constitutes a reckless disregard for participant safety beyond mere ordinary negligence. The gross negligence standard has been applied in Nevada adventure activity cases involving: a zip line operator that continued operations without performing required harness and trolley inspections; a climbing gym that failed to inspect and replace cracked or worn holds in violation of the gym’s own inspection protocols; a trampoline park that knowingly allowed simultaneous use of a trampoline section beyond rated capacity; and an adventure tour operator that failed to brief participants on known trail hazards present on the day of the activity. The distinction between ordinary negligence (waived) and gross negligence (not waived) turns on the operator’s knowledge of the specific risk and the degree of departure from reasonable care — the more the operator deviated from its own safety protocols and industry standards, the stronger the gross negligence argument. ASTM International’s standards for zip line tours (ASTM F2291), trampoline courts (ASTM F2970), and challenge courses (ASTM F2375) establish the industry minimum safety standards against which an operator’s conduct is measured. A zip line operator who failed to conduct required daily inspections under ASTM F2291 and whose equipment failure caused injury has strong gross negligence exposure regardless of any signed waiver.
Equipment Defect and Products Liability in Adventure Activity Injuries
When an adventure activity injury results from a defective product — a zip line trolley that failed due to a manufacturing defect in the wheel bearing, a climbing harness that buckle-failed under normal load, a bungee cord with a fatigue fracture in the elastic — Nevada strict products liability provides a claim against the equipment manufacturer that runs parallel to (and is not barred by) any operator negligence waiver. Under Nevada’s adoption of Restatement § 402A (Shoshone Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Dolinski, 82 Nev. 439 (1966)), a manufacturer who places a defectively designed or manufactured product into the stream of commerce is strictly liable for injuries caused by that defect without requiring proof of fault. A waiver signed with the zip line operator does not release the equipment manufacturer — who is not a party to the waiver — from products liability. In cases involving child participants in adventure activities (trampoline parks, junior rope courses), waivers signed by parents on behalf of minor children are generally unenforceable in Nevada for the child’s own personal injury claims, because a parent cannot waive a minor’s right to sue for future injuries under Nevada law — the minor’s claim belongs to the child. Marathon Law Group evaluates both operator liability and product defect theories in Las Vegas adventure activity injury cases to maximize recovery for injured participants.
If you or a loved one has been injured, contact our experienced Las Vegas personal injury attorney at Marathon Law Group. We offer free consultations and only get paid when you win.
For more information about your legal options, visit our Nevada personal injury practice area page or contact us today for a free consultation. You should also be aware of the Nevada personal injury statute of limitations to protect your rights.